Thank you for your message
It has been sent successfully. If you would prefer to book a meeting right away, choose your preferred time.
03 / 11 / 2026
Most companies have a budget. Fewer companies regularly compare it against actual results. And only a few of them can actually read anything useful out of that comparison. The usual scenario: the budget is created in December in Excel, actual figures come from accounting in a different structure, and the controller spends the first week of the month putting them together.
You can only compare what is structured in the exact same way. Therefore, do not build your plan in a different structure than the one you use to report actual results. If your management income statement divides revenue into three product lines and costs into direct and overhead, the plan must have the same rows. The same goes for cost centers and projects, see Controlling by cost centers and projects.
An annual budget divided evenly into twelfths is the fastest path to variances that tell you nothing. Seasonality, project deadlines, annual bonuses, or insurance payments belong in the month when they actually occur. If you do not know the monthly breakdown, take the distribution from the previous year and adjust it for known changes.
| Column | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Actual for the month | What happened |
| Plan for the month and variance | Whether the month turned out as expected |
| Year-to-date accumulation against the plan | Whether it is a trend or just a shift between months |
| Full-year forecast | Where the year is likely to end up when you combine actual results with the updated outlook |
The last column is the most important and most frequently missing. The budget does not change in February, but the forecast does. Management cares whether the year turns out well, not whether March matched the plan.
Within a group, each company has its own budget, often in a different currency. The consolidated plan must then go through the same eliminations as actual results, otherwise you are comparing apples to oranges. Piano Group used to have nine separate plans that were difficult to compare with actual results. Today, they have them in a single platform and compare the plan with actual results on an ongoing basis (Piano Group case study).
The income statement can be exactly on plan while cash is still missing. The income statement plan and cash flow plan should be based on the same assumptions. We describe short-term liquidity management in the article Thirteen-week cash flow forecast.
If actual figures are transferred from accounting manually, comparing them with the plan takes controllers days. If data is loaded automatically and the plan shares the same structure, variances are ready right after close and time goes into explaining them. We describe how to get there in the article How to shorten monthly reporting from weeks to days.
Example: September in a manufacturing company Amounts in million CZK.
| Row | September actual | September plan | Variance | January to September actual | January to September plan | Full-year forecast | Full-year budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 9.8 | 10.5 | -0.7 | 71.2 | 73.0 | 101.0 | 104.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.6 | 3.8 | -0.2 | 26.9 | 26.6 | 37.5 | 37.8 |
| Personnel costs | -1.9 | -1.8 | -0.1 | -16.4 | -16.2 | -22.0 | -21.6 |
| Overhead | -0.7 | -0.8 | 0.1 | -5.9 | -6.4 | -8.1 | -8.6 |
| EBITDA | 1.0 | 1.2 | -0.2 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 7.4 | 7.6 |
What you can read from the table in a few seconds: September was softer, but year-to-date EBITDA is 0.6 million CZK above plan because the company is holding down overhead and the margin is better than expected. However, revenue is lagging and the forecast says the year will end with revenue 3 million CZK below budget. Thanks to lower overhead, this barely impacts EBITDA yet. Personnel costs are growing faster than revenue, and that is a topic for the next management meeting.
A good commentary has three parts: what happened, why, and what it means for the rest of the year. A bad commentary just describes numbers the reader can see in the table.
| Bad | Good |
|---|---|
| Revenue is 0.7 million CZK lower than plan. | Customer X postponed deliveries worth 0.6 million CZK to October. This is a timing shift, the full-year forecast remains unchanged. |
| Personnel costs are higher. | We have had two new engineers since August, planned from November. Permanent +0.1 million CZK monthly, reflected in the forecast. |
| Overhead is lower. | Canceled participation in a trade fair worth 0.1 million CZK. The savings are permanent and already included in the forecast. |
The commentary is written by the manager responsible for the number and checked by the controller. If more than three sentences are written for a single variance, it is a topic for a meeting rather than a report.
In Symfio, you plan in the same structure in which you report actual results. The budget can be copied from Excel, forecasts and scenarios are maintained alongside it, and variances are calculated automatically, by company and for the group, with each company in its own currency. More on the Planning and Budgets page.
Some companies are completely abandoning the annual budget and replacing it with a rolling forecast. Every month or quarter, they update it for the next 12 to 18 months. The advantage is that the plan never gets outdated and management always looks a year ahead rather than just until December.
| Annual budget | Rolling forecast | |
|---|---|---|
| Horizon | Until the end of the year | Always 12 to 18 months ahead |
| Updates | Once a year | Monthly or quarterly |
| Used for | Management commitment, bonuses, bank | Management and decision making |
| Risk | Gets outdated during the first half of the year | Performance is hard to evaluate without a fixed target |
For most mid-sized companies, a combination works best: an approved annual budget as a commitment and for evaluation, alongside a forecast updated once a quarter. The key is that both must be built in the same structure and using the same data. Otherwise, time is spent reconciling versions instead of making decisions.
Leave the budget as approved and maintain the forecast next to it. Each of the two comparisons shows something different: the budget measures performance against commitment, while the forecast shows where the year will end up.
Most frequently once a quarter, or monthly in fast-changing companies.
At the level management actually uses to run the business. Planning at the individual ledger account level means a lot of work and little information.
Do not change the budget, but state it clearly in the report and fix the forecast. Next year, start building the budget from accounting history by month rather than top-down from an annual target.
For larger companies and groups, yes, at least working capital, debt, and cash. Without that, it is impossible to connect the income statement plan with the cash flow plan.
By subscribing you accept the Privacy Policy